Applicant applied for determination of the violation of their right to protect their material and moral existence and compensation due to the fact that they could not get a response from the Administrative Institutions to which they applied for compensation for their material and moral damages due to having a limp as a result of an intervention with a muscle relaxant injection in the state hospital which they applied with a complaint of low back pain. The Constitutional Court has decided that applicant’s right to protect their material and moral existence has been violated on the grounds that The Council of Forensic Medicine (ATK) report on which the court relied on was unreliable due to the fact that it contained matters not related to the applicant, that the decision has been made without clearing the doubts about this report and that the person who made the injection could not be determined from the records of the administration.